How is your progress?

-
Hi all - feel free to post your ideas and your progress so far if you are using the GCTS in any form, and especially if you have other ideas about self-training methods you'd like to share with everyone here!

Comments

Guillaume de Rouzé said…
Hi,

This is how i work. (i am actually 1854 FIDE without seriously working.)

-I learn tactics from the begining cause i need to know well the patterns
---->Material: 5665+1 positions by Polgar. Lot of mat in 2, in 3 and 600 miniature where you can look for attack on the castle king.
-Strategy: Silman book for a first look of the subject, then i pick up a position in " Chess Middlegame" by L. Polgar, work on it without moving the pieces, look at the solution and then play it against fritz 7 (enought strong !)
-Opening: should stop playing blitz to gain time for that !
-Endgame: Karsten Muller Fudamental is great, but i dont have time ! (need a better sheldule).

Conclusion: stop playing blitz and reading blog in order to gain time for study !
December 05, 2006 5:33 AM
seapawn said…
as someone starting out w/ chess study this has been a tremendous framework to organize and optimize my efforts. Right now ICC 900, and as a relative noob I'm working to strengthen my understanding of theory. given that, S blocks have been important for me, and I've been keeping these focused on themes. Before implementing the GCTS I was all over the place.

My short-term goals are 1. 1200 and 2. to feel comfortable enough playing in an OTB event, so my approach is probably more casual than those aiming for a rating of 2000+.

I'll spend anywhere from 30 min to 2 hrs a day on chess, and use roughly 30 min as a unit of time. 30 min is not strictly enforced, so if I'm really into studying a particular theme, I might spend 60 min on one unit.

I've organized my cycles as follows:

Group 1 - SO1, VT1, SG1, SE1
Group 2 - SO1, VT1, VE1, PL1
Group 3 - SO1, SG1, VT1, VG1
Group 4 - SO1, VT1, VE1, PL1

The order I complete units within a group changes from cycle to cycle depending on what I'm interested in at the time, but to make sure I'm staying balanced, I'll try to finish all units in a group before moving on to the next. I've loosely front loaded S in each group and since I'm tracking rating at the end of each cycle, PL is the last thing I do in group 4.

I keep a spreadsheet and check off units as I complete them, and I record my rating at the end of each cycle.

For me, the biggest benefit of this approach is the balanced approach and the structure.

Been using several of the books suggested on Mark's list. interested to hear what books others have used for VG units.
December 06, 2006 12:43 PM
Gravity said…
Guillaume,
Blitz Addiction is certainly the bane of good OTB chess. I have *exactly* the opposite problem - I don't play blitz at all, and it shows when I decide to log on and try a few games.
I know for me I need to play more blitz just to see positions in real time so I can improve my instincts...

Brendan,
It's really great to here from a 'noob' who finds the GCTS useful in some sort of way. Glad to here of it, and I think your goals are reasonable and attainable.

Good Luck to All!
December 06, 2006 12:57 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Color Complexes and the Bangiev Method

-
Color Complexes and the Bangiev Method I've been interested for some time in Alexander Bangiev's "B-Method" of decomposing a chess position so that one can find reasonable candidate moves based on (what I find) his unique and innovative system called the Squares Strategy. Here I'll attempt to explain as much as I can how a run-of-the-mill player like myself views this method and if it is something that the average Joe chess player can take advantage of. Bangiev claims that this method targets players rated approximately 1800 in the german rating system, and that is just about where I sit today, give or take 100 points. I will leave out the "B-Notation" - the shorthand symbolic language he uses to discuss the specifics of a position - as that just tends to confuse the new learner. I'll attempt to explain it in laymans english. Hopefully I do not violate any copyrights. If I do, I apologize. First we must define what it is we are looking at: What is T...
Read more

Karpov's 7 timeless reference points for evaluating a position

-
Karpov's 7 timeless reference points for evaluating a position Stage one: Comparative analysis. Material relationship between the forces Presence of direct threats Position of the kings, their safety Possession of open lines Pawn Structure, weak and strong squares The centre and space Development and the position of pieces Stage two:  choosing a plan. The choice of an attacking or defensive plan in any situation is determined by an objective evaluation of the position. And although these positions are different in terms of their specific features, for each of them there are defined rules about the methods of battle in better (1), worse (2) and equal (3) positions. 1 In better positions – with an advantage in development – you should try to prevent your opponent from completing the mobilization of his forces. To achieve this you should choose, as the opportunity arises, moves that present concrete threats, forcing your opponent to waste time and energy deflecting ...
Read more

Generic Training Schedule

-
Putting together a training schedule for yourself sounds like an easy task. No problem! I'll just study openings on Monday, do some middlgame strategy on Tuesday, then perhaps some endgames on Wednesday, and sprinkle some online games here and there. But in reality, if you are like me, it's difficult to do because we, as chessplayers, are averse to doing anything that is not really fun. Half way through your opening sessions you find yourself suddenly emmersed in a bullet tournament on ICC or Playchess. Endings? Bah! I know Lucena's - good enough. It is a lack of discipline in our non-playing activities that keep us right were we settle in the rating scale. ANY player can steadily improve if they apply a basic schedule to their studies and become persistent in executing those studies. In fact, I would venture that outside of any extraordinary talent, any player can see improvement up to the 2100-2200 rating level using this study plan as a guide. This 4-day study plan encom...
Read more